As a pastor,
I’ve always wanted to avoid the Church Museum Tour guide approach to sermons –
and ministry in general. Now, it’s true,
if the church were a museum, it would indeed be pretty interesting; there’s all
the artifacts, all the stories, the miracles, the Bible Versions.
The thing
is, sometimes this how we see the faith stories now a-days – as if they were in
showcases, behind glass, behind roped off areas, with signs saying “DO NOT
TOUCH!” As if these things need to be
protected from the hands of the unrighteous, from people who don’t understand any
of this right!
Sometimes we
feel these stories might very well be interesting,
but we might feel they may not really be –in grand scheme--- relevant
to our lives. After all, we aren’t
ancient Near Eastern Jews! As a result, all this bible-stuff might sometimes
feel alien to us. These stories, the characters, are not from our times, and they certainly not
written in our words. They are indeed alien to our lives, to where we live, and how we live… today!
Here, in our 21st Century World.
So my
interest in preaching has always been to help us see that while these stories are historically interesting, and are
related to history – ancient history for
sure – we should be able to hold the stories.
If we preachers treat these stories as museum pieces, as artifacts of some bygone era, and don’t
allow people to handle the stories, to
feel the power for themselves, to
hear the deeper whispers in the stories, to listen for the words in our era –– in our times and places… then they really do remain just interesting historical artifacts. And we do everyone – all of us – a dis-service!
Yes, these
stories have history, and they have historical nuance, and they may have
political and theological agendas, and they have deeper messages! And they can inform us about who God
is… still… today… here in the 21st Century.
Having said
all that, the story of the last few days of Jesus’ life; from entering
Jerusalem for the last time, to his trial, and crucifixion – this classic Holy
Week story – is very much like a museum piece.
There’s some interested things in the story for sure; historical and political. It’s interesting to hear what’s between the
lines in all this – interestingly, a perfect interactive museum tour piece. So let’s look at the piece; let’s pick it
up and examine it.
Jesus not
only challenged the authority of Rome – of Caesar. He also challenged the Jewish, temple
system. Remember the story of the
Pharisees asking Jesus whether Jews should pay taxes to Rome or not? Jesus asks, “Who’s image is on the
coin?” “Caesar’s.” And here comes the oft repeated… “Then give
to Caesar what’s Caesars, and give to God what’s God’s!” Now, we often interpret this from the
perspective of our era – that Jesus was talking about the distinction between
the lesser secular material world and the more evolved world of the Spirit – when
maybe more accurately Jesus was making a pretty strong case for the sovereignty
of not only his God (over the god Caesar), but his people (over against the
imperialism of Rome). The implications
here are not only religious, but political!
Jesus rejects the Roman
understanding that Caesar is a god… he’s certainly not the god of any pious
Jew! The money with his image on it
belongs to him! But the land, and the
temple on it, that’s NOT Caesars! That
all belongs to the God of the Jews!
He also
questioned the temple system; a system that was complicated and expensive and held
tremendous control over people; if you didn’t do the prescribed religious
requirements then the temple leaders would not certify you as clean/right with
God – which meant you weren’t able to completely be a part of the community of
God.
The priests
and leaders had monopoly on all things God.
But it didn’t start out this way!
All across ancient near east, sacrifices were part of life – a way of
honoring the sacred, and relationships.
But over time, things got more and more structured, more and more
organized, more and more complicated… and more control could be exerted on the
people.
John the
Baptist… he preached (directly from the Gospel texts) “a baptism of repentance for
the forgiveness of sins”; no temple required, no temple taxes, no fees, nothing
more involved than a desire to be right with God! Is it a surprise he got executed?
And Jesus questioned this system too! He threw out the money-changers, an
expression of cleaning up the unrighteousness, the corruption, in the
system. Jesus, like John, also repeatedly
forgave people in the name of the Living God, dispensing totally with any
elaborate and/or expensive ceremony… a direct challenge to the temple system. Jesus challenged the system that allowed
those in power (and those who abused power) to STAY in power. He questioned the justice of it… the rightness of it. And this put him on the Temple Leadership
hit-list; he was certainly challenging not only the temple system… he was quite
possibly drawing down the Roman hammer on them all!
When the Romans conquered people, they often found it much easier (and
cheaper too) to make deals with local (conquered and occupied) political and
religious leadership… the conquered version of the 1%.
And here was the deal from the Roman perspective in a
nutshell: If you support us, we’ll let you keep your
power and titles. And we’ll support you and your positions! We’ll even defend you from popular
revolt! But if you challenge us…
or if you allow anyone to challenge us… all bets are off… along with your heads! So, it behooves you to keep order!” Usually
this worked like a charm!
Not only was the temple
leadership priesthood part of this 1%, so were the religious leaders in the
Sanhedrin (the leadership council). They basically traded their sovereignty for
their positions... and they fought hard
to keep the order as it was! They’d traded
not only their freedom, but the
freedom of all the Israelites in
Judah for the privilege of remaining in the 1%. This why, in the eyes of the common people (the
rest of the 99%) these leaders looked at best like sell-outs and at worse like traitors!
The average people, the 99%, were looking more and more for a messiah, a leader that would remove the yoke of oppression – not just the oppression of the occupying Romans, but also the oppression of the bought-and-paid-for temple and religious leadership. This hoped-for messiah that was to come in the name of God to establish God’s righteous kingdom… one free from not only occupation, but also the corruption and injustice that came with it.
But the religious
leaders had a whole different mentality (of course… they had more to
lose!): If the Romans see this, and see we’re not doing anything about it, they
might bring down the hammer on us! All
of us!
The story goes that while they were in Jerusalem, Judas
Iscariot (one of his twelve disciples) went to the leading priests and arranged
to betray Jesus for 30 pieces of silver.
He’d made the deal, but just needed to find the right time to turn him
over to the authorities.
On the first day of the Festival of Unleavened Bread, Jesus made
plans to celebrate the Passover with his disciples; they found a place, and
they prepared for the remembrance. That evening, the story tells that while Jesus
was eating with the twelve, Jesus said “One
of you will betray me." They were shocked! After three years of being together… three years of learning and growing and
seeing miracles… this just made no sense!
They looked around… this just couldn’t be!
"One of you who has just eaten with me will betray
me. The scriptures have said the
Son of Man must die.”
Judas said – “It can’t be me!”
“You already know.” Said Jesus.
As they were eating, Jesus, took some bread and blessed it…
he broke the bread into pieces and passed them out, saying, "Take this and
eat it, this bread is my body."
And after eating, he took a cup of wine, again he gave thanks to God for it, then passed it to them saying, "Drink from this cup, each of you. This is my blood confirming the covenant between God and God’s people. This is poured out as a sacrifice to forgive sin. I will not drink wine again until the day I drink it new with you in my Father's Kingdom."
The story continues that when they had finished, Jesus went
with some disciples to Mount of Olives to pray. On the way, Jesus told them, “Tonight all of
you will desert me, confirming what the scriptures say; 'God will strike the Shepherd, and the sheep
of the flock will be scattered.'"
Peter declared: “Others
may desert you, Lord, but I never will!”
Jesus turned to look at him… "Tonight… before the sun
rises… before the rooster crows… you
will deny three times that you even know me."
"Never!", insisted Peter! “Even if I have to die with you, I will never deny you!"
As they got closer to the olive grove called Gethsemane, they could tell Jesus grew more and more anguished, more and more distressed. Jesus asked them to sit and wait, to stay awake, while he prayed.
He went on a little farther, and fell to the ground in a heap,
with his face on the ground. He praying:
"Father! I don’t
know if I can do this! Take this
suffering from me! But… help me to do your will in this, not mine!”
When he got back to
where the disciples were waiting, he found them all sleeping. He woke up Peter asking why he couldn’t have
stayed awake, and resist temptation. He went, again to prayer…
"Father! If this
cup can’t be taken and I have to drink from it… then help
me let your will be done."
He came back found them asleep again! He left and prayed a third time.
When he came back, he told them: "It’s time to get up! The time has come! It’s time for the Son of Man is to be handed
over to the unrighteous. My betrayer is here!”
As he said this, Judas arrived with a crowd of armed temple guards and others.
Judas had arranged a signal ahead of time with them – whoever
he greeted would be the one they were to arrest. The
story tells that Judas came straight to Jesus…
"Greetings, Rabbi!" he exclaimed, and he hugged and kissed
him. This is where the saying “Betrayed
with a kiss” comes from! But Jesus already
knew what he was planning,
"Do what you have come here to do.”
As the soldiers were taking Jesus into custody, one of the
men with Jesus pulled out his sword and struck the high priest's slave, slashing
off his ear.
"Stop! Put your sword away!" Jesus
told him. “Don’t be tempted to use violence as
a way to get your will done. And don't
you know… I could ask God –and get–
an army of angels in an instant? But if I did that… how would the Scriptures be fulfilled about
what’s supposed to happen?"
Jesus then turned to the guards: "Am I that dangerous a revolutionary
that you need soldiers and swords in the dark? Why didn't you arrest me in the Temple? I
was there every day teaching. But
this is all happening to fulfill the words of the prophets as recorded in the
Scriptures."
At that point, all the disciples deserted him and fled in
fear and confusion!
He was taken to Caiaphas’s house, the high priest. All the religious leaders and elders were
there waiting.
Meanwhile, Peter followed him at a distance and came to the
high priest's courtyard. He went in and sat with the guards and waited
to see how things would turn out.
While Peter was outside, Jesus was inside being questioned by
the Sanhedrin – the high council. The Gospel
story says they were waiting to hear from lying witnesses so they could have Jesus
executed!
They asked Jesus: "Well…
what do you have to say for yourself?"
But Jesus didn’t speak.
"I demand in the name of the living God… tell us if you are the Messiah, the Son of
God."
"These are your words.” Jesus replied. “And in the future you will see the Son of
Man seated in the place of power at God's right hand in heaven."
This enraged the religious leaders! "He
speaks Blasphemy!” said the High Priest.
“We don’t need any witnesses! We’ve heard him ourselves!” And turning to the rest of the council,
Caiaphas asked “What is your verdict?"
"Guilty!" they shouted. "He deserves to
die!"
While this was going on inside, Peter was sitting outside in
the courtyard. A servant girl saw him and
asked if he was one of Jesus’s disciples.
Peter denied it in front of everyone…
"I don't know what you're talking about."
He wasn’t just taken by surprise with the question… he was
scared! He knew it wasn’t going end
well for Jesus. It was looking pretty
bad for him, and he didn’t want to
end up the same way.
Later, out by the gate, someone else noticed Peter. She said she thought she’d seen him before
with Jesus. Again… Peter denied it!
“I don't even know the man," he said.
A little later some of the other bystanders came over to
Peter and said,
"You must be one of them – we can tell by your Galilean
accent."
Peter swore, "I’ve never met the man!”
And right after he said these very words… the rooster crowed.
Suddenly… Jesus' words
flashed through his mind: "Before
the rooster crows… you will deny three
times that you even know me."
He felt such deep shame! He just
couldn’t stay there any longer!
By
that point the leaders took Jesus before Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor. Jesus remained silent as the religious
leaders explained their charges against him.
"Don't
you hear all these charges they are bringing against you?" Pilate demanded. But Jesus made no response to any of the
charges.
This
is the Gospel story… but you need to
hear what’s not in the story… you need to hear from scholars, historians.
The
Gospel this story comes from – Matthew – was written around year 80 of the Common
Era, after
the revolt in Judea… after
the failed revolt against the Roman occupiers… when the temple was destroyed… and
most of residents of Jerusalem were killed… and those who survived were sent
away into exile… an exile that would not
see a Jewish homeland again until 1949.
The
Romans destroyed the city as completely as possible! They the place into an abandoned wasteland! This is not hyperbole… this is history! It did happen that way!
This
is significant because this devastation influenced the writer of the Gospel story! This story was written NOT for a Jewish audience… but fora Gentile audience… a Roman
Gentile audience. After the failed
Hebrew revolt, the Hebrews became “Bad Guys” to the Romans! The Romans never really did have a high
regard for the Hebrew People, but after this revolt attempt, they were
considered with even more suspicion, derision, contempt!
The
writer of this Gospel changes the story, working into it ideas that may not
have been historically accurate… but they served political ends; Roman acceptance
of this new movement of the followers of the Christ. This story
would attempt to ingratiate itself into Roman hearts and minds by making the
Romans – the victors in this very one-sided war – look good while at the same
time making the Jews – the losers – look bad.
While
the followers of J. had their origins within the Jewish tradition (after all,
there was no denying that Jesus himself was Jewish) the Gospel writer made some
conscious efforts to distance this budding movement, this growing number of Roman gentile
followers… of a Jewish Messiah… from the very tradition their messiah came
from!
The
writer of this Gospel did not want this new, and very important movement of God
to be seen in the eyes of the Roman people as a “Jewish” movement… as having anything to do with these “enemies
of the State”, but as a wholly independent movement.
The
Story of Jesus and Pilate continues in Matthew. It tells that Pilate had a custom to release
a prison every year at Passover. The Romans
were meticulous record keepers. Scholars
indeed have enough surviving records to piece together a pretty good pictures
of life in Judea from Roman perspective. These historical accounts don’t
corroborate this “custom” of Pilate as mentioned in the Gospel story. So
why would the story teller have included it?
Because this was part of a bigger picture of trying to make the Jews
look bad and the Romans look good.
But
the story tells that Pilate asked the people who they wanted him to release; Jesus…
“Whom you call the Messiah” or a
notorious rebel named Barabbas?
And
in the story the crowd yells out: “Give
us Barabbas!”
While
Pilate was judging Jesus’ fate, the story tells that his wife sent him a message. She’d had a terrible dream about
Jesus the night before, a dream that warned her (and her husband) to leave Jesus
alone.
Again,
another example of demonstrating the goodness of Roman leadership. In Matthews Gospel, Pilate was actually
trying to help Jesus.
Pilate
asks, “What do you want me to do with Jesus who is called the Messiah?" The “bad” Jews shout back, "Crucify
him!"
In
the story, Pilate continues – "But he hasn’t committed any crime!"
But
the mob roared even louder, "Crucify him!"
The
story recounts that Pilate recognized he wasn't getting anywhere, and that a
riot was developing. So the story says he sent for a bowl of water
and washed his hands before the crowd, saying, "I am innocent of this man's
blood. The responsibility is yours!"
“Let
his blood be on us and our children!” While
this was written into the text as another attempt to identify this new Christian
movement, not with Judaism, but with Roman ideals by using the already negative
public opinion of Jews!
Hearing
that the death of Jesus was the Jews fault and not the Romans fault would of
course play MUCH better a Roman Christian community!
And
while these words were meant to legitimize this movement in Rome… it served an
unintentional, and much darker purpose… the demonizing of a People for
centuries to come! “Let his blood be on our heads, and those of
our Children!” has remained the foundation for pogroms and genocide attempts against
the “Christ Killers” even to our day!
Yet,
history tells a different story altogether!
The “real” Pilate was actually incredibly cruel! He, the Pilate of history, had virtually no
concern for Jewish public opinion! From
what we know about him, he cared not one whit for what this Jewish rabble would
have wanted!
But
the Gospel story continues that Pilate gave in to the crowd –– a thing done
only by the Pilate of the Gospels, a
thing the historical Pilate would never have dreamed of doing! He releases Barabbas… and orders Jesus to be flogged first, then crucified.
Some of the governor's soldiers took Jesus into their headquarters to torture and insult him; they put a purple robe on him (purple being the color reserved for royalty), they put a crown made from thorns on his head, they placed a reed in his right hand as a scepter… a sad mockery of a king!
Some of the governor's soldiers took Jesus into their headquarters to torture and insult him; they put a purple robe on him (purple being the color reserved for royalty), they put a crown made from thorns on his head, they placed a reed in his right hand as a scepter… a sad mockery of a king!
When
they got tired of this torture and insults, they led him away to be crucified. On the way they enlisted Simon of Cyrene to
help Jesus carry his cross because Jesus could no longer carry it himself.
When
they got to place called Golgotha (which means "Place of the Skull") a place that really did exist, a hill seen
clearly from the road leading into Jerusalem, a place people could see the bodies
on crosses… a sight specifically designed to demonstrate to any visitor of the power
of Rome… there at this place, they nailed him to the cross.
They
fastened a sign above Jesus' head ----in Latin, a titulus ---- a sign for
all to read, describing the crime of the condemned man. Jesus’ titulus – the charge against him… the
charge condemning him to death… read:
"Iesu
Nazaret, Rex Iudeum” Jesus of Nazareth, King
of the Jews.
A very Roman charge! A very Roman execution!
The
story says it seemed everyone mocked Jesus;
People
passing by
shouted abuses – “If
you are Son of God… save yourself… come down from the cross!"
Some
religious
leaders also mocked Jesus -- "Look
at him! He saved others," "but he can't save himself!
The
text says even revolutionaries crucified with him ridiculed him.
He
was abandoned… lost… emptied of all hope. The story says, around noon the skies darkened… and they stayed that
way for about 3 hours.
At
about three o'clock, Jesus gathered what little energy he had left, and called
out… as loud as he could muster…
"Lord,
Lord, why have you abandoned me?"
He
felt abandoned… isolated. He shouted one
last time… and… like a soldier mortally wounded on the field
of battle… with no-one left to save him…
no hand to hold… no loved one to be comforted by… knowing he was going to die alone… far away
from home… from the people he called home… in that abandonment… he died.
The
story says that very same moment he took his last breath, the curtain in the
sanctuary of the Temple – the curtain that isolated the most holy place in the
holiest of temples – ripped from top to bottom!
This
was the last act of a revolutionary life – he had torn open direct access to
God. Only the High Priest could enter this
place to meet God… and that only one time per year. And if he didn’t do the prescribed rituals
exactly right, he would be in mortal danger of death!
And
here, the story says Jesus was able to do in his dying the very thing he had dedicated
his life doing… making access to God free, to all!
The
earth shook… rocks split apart… tombs opened… says the story. What power indeed!
The
Roman officer and the other soldiers at the crucifixion were terrified by the
earthquake and all that had happened.
They
said, "This man truly was the Son of God!"
This
man was the Son of God… This man!
THIS man! Not Caesar! This was indeed one of Caesars titles “The
Son of God”
The
Gospel writer tells its original audience, its original Roman Gentile audience, reminds them, instructs them, teaches
them, Caesar IS NOT GOD! These were counter-cultural words! They
are anti-establishment, anti- anything
that places anything before God.
Here we are warned… we…
us… who live over 2 thousand
years after these words were originally written, that we must be ever vigilant,
against the persuasion of the powers of our day that would turn us from the
call of this man… Jesus of Nazareth… who himself was executed by the powers of his day… his
revolutionary message that God is indeed accessible sometimes, not because of but in spite of, our organized systems of religious control!
…That
the people we most want to marginalize… are the very ones we are called to see
God in!
…That
the people we want to hate most… want to
push away most… those we have
inclinations to resist most… these… we are told…
are our brothers and sisters!
But we have a most natural tendency to resist this message!
Who do the powers of our day call us to resist?
Who
do the currents of our society call us to hate today?
Who
are these powers calling us to lump all together into one undifferentiated
bundle labeled “Bad People”?
Remember…
When
we lift our voices into one unified chorus shouting…
“Crucify
them! Crucify them all!”…
WE are the ones shouting “Crucify him!”
“Crucify HIM!”
Calling
ourselves Christian… followers of Christ… Christ… the one who died because of his
belief ALL are brothers and sisters… ALL
are one in this all-encompassing God… who died challenging an unjust system of
haves and have-nots… a system completely
acceptable to the “haves”… living
off the labor and blood and lives of the “have-nots”…
It
is NOT easy! It is NOT easy to call
ourselves Christian… because this name calls us to be ever vigilant to the hate in us… the hate from
us…
And…
just as evil… the tendency to ignore injustice if we’re
not the ones affected by it. The
tendency to remain silent in the face of any –ism… that affects the poor, the marginalized, people of other races and religions and
traditions and skin colors…
These tendencies reside in us… all of us…
It
is easier for us to point our fingers to raise our fists to righteously call for Crucifixion…
…than
it is to call them brothers… or
sisters… children of the same God… to
take the time to learn and grow and listen and hope… and pray…
Brothers
and sisters… we are entering the most
solemn week in our tradition… a week were we are called to come face to face
with our own desires to crucify!
A
week we must come to grips… again… with our own tendencies to reject the very
things Christ calls us to accept.
It
is solemn… because we walk this
path… knowing… we are at the same time the ones calling for crucifixion –– the ones
Christ is being crucified for –– the ones enlisted, like Simon of Cyrene, to carry Jesus’s Cross… our
cross… the one we want to use to execute others on.
Sometimes
we are like the Gospel writer… we want to white wash our tendencies to violence
and darkness, and blame them on the “other”… like Matthew does with the Romans
and the Jews in this story! Out of concern for his growing movement in the
city of the victors, he chooses political expediency over historical fact. He sacrifices the Jews to make his point… The "Jews" did not kill Jesus… a system of power and control killed him! A corrupt system fight for its survival killed him! An empire killed him! the Romans killed him!
But had he said it that way… this
would have very probably cost him the budding Christian community in Rome!
Brothers
and sister, remember this story!
Remember its characters, its intricacies, its unspoken words… its hidden
words.
Remember.
No comments:
Post a Comment